Arnold S. Trebach, a lawyer and self-proclaimed harm reduction pioneer, ignited controversy with his 1982 book, “The Heroin Solution.” Trebach argued for a radical shift in heroin policy, advocating for its prescription to addicts and terminally ill patients. This article dissects Trebach’s arguments and reveals the flaws in his logic.
A History of Heroin and its Allure
Trebach begins by outlining the history of heroin, highlighting its initial marketing as a non-addictive cough suppressant by Bayer in 1898. He details its rapid rise as a popular painkiller before outlining the legislative crackdowns that began in the early 20th century. Trebach acknowledges the addictive nature of heroin but downplays the concept of tolerance – a crucial aspect of addiction where users require increasing doses to achieve the same effect.
The British Model and its Faults
Trebach champions the British system of the 1970s, where specialised clinics provided heroin to registered addicts. He claims this approach reduced crime and improved addicts’ lives. However, Trebach cherry-picks his evidence. He ignores the limitations of the British model, which catered primarily to a small number of older, often terminally ill, addicts. This system wouldn’t be applicable to the larger, younger demographic of heroin users prevalent in the US during the same period.
Trebach also fails to address the black market. While the British system might have provided a legal source for some addicts, it wouldn’t eliminate the illegal drug trade altogether. Street heroin, often cheaper and readily available, remained a significant temptation.
Dismissing Methadone and Ignoring Sex Work
Trebach criticises methadone, a synthetic opioid used to treat heroin addiction, arguing it simply replaces one addiction with another. However, methadone programs offer a controlled way to manage cravings and withdrawal symptoms, ultimately helping some users transition to a drug-free life. Trebach completely ignores the issue of sex work, a hidden aspect of the heroin epidemic. Many sex workers become addicted to heroin to cope with the emotional and physical trauma of their profession. Trebach’s solution wouldn’t address this complex issue.
The Iron Law of Opium: A Flawed Argument
Trebach introduces the “Iron Law of Opium,” suggesting that suppressing heroin production in one region simply leads to its cultivation elsewhere. While there’s some truth to this, it ignores the potential for international cooperation and crop control efforts. He also avoids the critical role of disrupting distribution networks and reducing overall supply.
Trebach briefly touches on radical solutions like social reform to address the underlying causes of addiction, particularly poverty and societal pressures. These ideas, however, are quickly dismissed. He argues that focusing solely on reducing availability is the most effective strategy, a claim contradicted by the history of drug policy.
Trebach’s “Heroin Solution” offers a simplistic answer to a complex problem. His book cherry-picks evidence and ignores crucial aspects of addiction, such as tolerance and the social determinants of drug use. While harm reduction strategies have a role to play, Trebach’s proposal for widespread heroin prescription is irresponsible and potentially dangerous. A more comprehensive approach that addresses the root causes of addiction, combined with effective treatment options, is necessary to truly combat the heroin epidemic.
Leave a Reply