As Australia approaches four decades of harm reduction policies, it’s crucial to examine the effectiveness and consequences of this approach. This part 2 expose explore the statistics, facts, and figures that reveal the troubling reality behind harm reduction strategies and their impact on drug use and related deaths in Australia.
Australia: The Harm Reduction Pioneer
In 1985, Australia led the world in implementing harm reduction drug policies. During a historic meeting on April 2, 1985, then-Prime Minister Bob Hawke and state leaders adopted “harm minimisation” as Australia’s official national drug policy. This decision had far-reaching repercussions, setting a precedent that many other nations would follow.
The Devastating Track Record
Despite its noble intentions, harm reduction policies have led to alarming increases in drug use and related deaths in Australia. The statistics paint a grim picture of the policy’s failure:
Skyrocketing Drug Use (1988-1998)
Following the implementation of harm minimisation policies, Australia saw dramatic increases in drug use between 1988 and 1998:
- Amphetamine use increased by 500%
- Cannabis use increased by 300%
- Cocaine use increased by 400%
- Ecstasy use increased by 750%
- Heroin use increased by approximately 300% (based on heroin deaths as a proxy)
These staggering figures demonstrate that rather than reducing harm, the policies appeared to normalise and encourage drug use.
Australia: World Leader in Drug Use
By 1998, Australia had become the world leader in drug use among developed economies. A United Nations report from 2002 showed Australia at the top of the list for aggregated average use of the five main illicit drug types, followed closely by New Zealand, which had also adopted harm reduction programming.
Rising Death Toll
The increased drug use translated into a tragic rise in drug-related deaths. Opiate-related deaths in Australia peaked at 1,116 in 1999, up from just 347 in 1988. This exponential increase in mortality rates directly contradicts the stated goals of harm reduction policies.
The Tough on Drugs Era: A Brief Respite
From 1998 to 2007, Australia implemented the “Tough on Drugs” policy, which focused on drug prevention while maintaining existing harm reduction programs. This approach led to:
- A 39% decrease in illicit drug use
- A 67% drop in opiate overdose deaths
These significant improvements demonstrate that a more balanced approach, emphasising prevention and rehabilitation, can effectively reduce both drug use and related deaths.
The Return to Harm Reduction: Renewed Failure
Unfortunately, with the scrapping of the Tough on Drugs policy in 2008, Australia saw a return to the accelerating dynamic of increased drug use and related deaths. This pattern clearly shows that harm reduction policies, when given ascendency, consistently lead to more harm rather than less.
Why Harm Reduction Produces Harm
The failure of harm reduction policies in Australia can be attributed to several key factors that have inadvertently increased drug use and related harms. These factors demonstrate why harm reduction, despite its intentions, has led to more harm than good.
Normalisation of Drug Use
By focusing on making drug use “safer” rather than discouraging it altogether, harm reduction policies send a dangerous message that drug use is acceptable and manageable. This normalisation process has had profound effects on Australian society, particularly among young people.
The statistics from the National Drug Strategy Household Surveys clearly illustrate this point. Between 1988 and 1998, following the implementation of harm reduction policies, Australia saw dramatic increases in drug use across various substances. For instance, amphetamine use increased by 500%, cannabis by 300%, cocaine by 400%, and ecstasy by a staggering 750%. These figures demonstrate that rather than reducing harm, the policies appeared to normalise and encourage drug use, leading to Australia becoming a world leader in drug consumption among developed economies.
Lack of Emphasis on Prevention and Abstinence
Harm reduction strategies often neglect the importance of preventing drug use in the first place and helping users achieve complete abstinence. This oversight has resulted in a failure to address the root causes of drug abuse and addiction.
The brief success of the “Tough on Drugs” policy from 1998 to 2007 highlights the effectiveness of a more balanced approach that emphasises prevention and rehabilitation. During this period, as stated, Australia saw a 39% decrease in illicit drug use and a 67% drop in opiate overdose deaths. These significant improvements demonstrate that focusing on prevention and abstinence can effectively reduce both drug use and related deaths. However, with the return to harm reduction-focused policies in 2008, Australia once again saw an acceleration in drug use and related harms, underscoring the importance of prevention-based approaches.
False Sense of Security
Measures like pill testing and supervised injection sites may give users a false sense that their drug use is safe, potentially encouraging continued or increased use. This misplaced confidence in the safety of drug use can lead to tragic consequences.
The concept of “safe” drug use is fundamentally flawed. As the document emphasises, there is no such thing as an “overdose” on non-prescribed drugs, as there are no safe dose rates for these substances. What users are doing, even when they claim it’s for recreational purposes, is self-poisoning. By implementing harm reduction measures without adequately addressing the inherent dangers of drug use, governments are effectively supporting and encouraging this destructive behaviour.
Undermining of Deterrence
Decriminalisation and other harm reduction approaches can reduce the deterrent effect of legal consequences, potentially leading to increased experimentation and use. This weakening of legal deterrents has contributed to the rise in drug use and related harms.
The success of Australia’s drug courts demonstrates the importance of maintaining legal incentives for treatment and rehabilitation. These courts have a long track record of success in motivating drug users to enter rehabilitation programs. However, decriminalisation policies threaten to remove this crucial motivator. Without the threat of criminal sanctions, there is little incentive for users to seek treatment and achieve abstinence. This undermining of deterrence directly contradicts the desires of the Australian public, who overwhelmingly disapprove of regular drug use and want to see less, not more, drug use in their communities.
The Myth of Safe Drug Use
It’s crucial to emphasise that there is no such thing as “safe” illicit drug use. The concept of an “overdose” on non-prescribed drugs is misleading, as there are no safe dose rates for these substances. What users are doing, even when they claim it’s for recreational purposes, is self-poisoning. Alarmingly, governments implementing harm reduction policies are effectively supporting and encouraging this destructive behaviour.
Australian Attitudes Towards Drug Use
Contrary to the permissive approach of harm reduction policies, the vast majority of Australians do not approve of regular drug use:
- 96-99% disapprove of regular use of heroin, cocaine, speed/ice, and ecstasy
- 80% disapprove of regular cannabis use
These statistics, from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare’s National Drug Strategy Household Survey, clearly indicate that Australians want less drug use in their society, not more.
The Need for a Paradigm Shift
The evidence overwhelmingly shows that harm reduction policies have failed to achieve their stated goals and have instead contributed to increased drug use and related deaths in Australia. It’s time for a fundamental reevaluation of our approach to drug policy.
Instead of continuing down the failed path of harm reduction, Australia must pivot to a policy focused on prevention, abstinence, and recovery. This approach should include:
- Increased funding for drug prevention education in schools
- Expansion of mandatory rehabilitation programs
- Strengthening of drug courts and legal incentives for treatment
- Public messaging that emphasises the dangers of all drug use, rather than how to use “safely”
Only by taking a firm stance against all illicit drug use can we hope to reverse the devastating trends and truly protect public health and safety. It’s time to abandon the dangerous illusion of “safe” drug use and embrace policies that genuinely reduce harm by preventing drug use altogether.
Leave a Reply