A new scientific study from Australia has raised alarms about the potential dangers of cannabis, describing it as a “genotoxic” substance that can harm genetic material within cells. According to the research, this genetic damage might lead to DNA mutations, a heightened risk of cancer, accelerated ageing, and even impact future generations through damaged sperm and eggs. Dr. Stuart Reece, co-author of the study, stated, “The link we’ve described between cannabis use and genotoxicity has far-reaching consequences. This new research shows how genetic damage from cannabis use can be passed down the generations. This should reframe the discussion surrounding cannabis legalization from a personal choice to one that potentially involves multiple subsequent generations”. News-medical.net

Stuart Reece, the study’s co-author from the University of Western Australia, highlighted the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in these effects. When cannabinoids are present, mitochondria — the cell’s energy providers — could become impaired, raising the risk of chromosomal damage.

While the connection between cannabis and cancer is still debated due to mixed findings in earlier research, the study points to concerns about rising marijuana potency since the 1970s. The researchers flagged heightened risks such as testicular cancer and a dramatic acceleration of ageing, reportedly by as much as 30% by the age of 30.

Published in Addiction Biology, the study urges a rethink on cannabis use, framing it as a public health issue that stretches beyond personal choice to one with multi-generational implications. With recreational cannabis already legal in 24 US states and debates around further legalisation ongoing, the findings offer a critical reminder of the long-term risks often overshadowed in discussions about marijuana use.

This Australian study sheds light on the long-term effects of cannabis use that are often overlooked in discussions about its impact. It pushes us to reconsider how we view cannabis, not just as a personal choice, but as something that could have wider consequences for both individuals and future generations.

Source: New York Post