Alabama is considering Senate Bill 132 (SB132), a proposed law aimed at enacting a Psychoactive Hemp Ban by reclassifying psychoactive cannabinoids as controlled substances. This move would eliminate the availability of non-industrial hemp products such as THC-infused beverages and federally compliant edibles. The aim, supporters contend, is to protect public health and prevent underage access to potentially unsafe products in an unregulated market.

Proponents of the bill stress the importance of accountability within the hemp industry. By targeting psychoactive products, they argue that the legislation prioritises community safety and ensures stricter oversight. However, critics have raised concerns about the motivations behind SB132, questioning whether the measure serves as a strategic attempt by marijuana operators to minimise competition. These claims highlight the uneven regulatory costs that currently favour hemp producers over marijuana businesses.

Advocates Push for Regulation Amid Psychoactive Hemp Ban Debate

While the proposed Hemp Product Restrictions have sparked strong reactions, many in the hemp sector argue that regulation is a better solution than a complete ban. Introducing safety testing, age restrictions, and strict labelling requirements could address safety concerns effectively without dismantling the entire psychoactive hemp industry. This would safeguard consumers while preserving access to popular products like THC beverages and low-THC edibles, which are widely used by individuals seeking alternatives to alcohol or pain management solutions.

If SB132 passes, Alabama will join other states that have already adopted similar Psychoactive Hemp Ban measures. However, critics warn of the broader consequences of such a ban, including reduced access to safer alternatives and stifled market innovation. The debate continues as stakeholders call for legislators to prioritise public safety while allowing regulated industries to coexist in a balanced way.

Source: National Law Review